|
|

 |
|
|
INDEPENDENT
SECTOR Letter to the FEC on Advisory
Opinion's Affect on Nonprofit SpeechFebruary
4, 2004
Commission Secretary
Federal Election Commission
999 E Street, NW
Washington, DC 20463
Re: Draft Advisory Opinion 2003-37
Dear Commission Secretary:
INDEPENDENT SECTOR, a coalition
of nearly 700 charitable nonprofit organizations, philanthropic
foundations, and corporate giving programs, is writing to express
our strong concern regarding the scope and implications of the
General Counsel’s draft Advisory Opinion 2003-37 prepared in
response to a request by Americans for a Better Country (“ABC”).
The majority of our members are organized as nonprofit corporations
under state law and are exempt from federal income taxation under
sections 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Most are actively
engaged in educating the public and advocating positions on
legislative and policy issues related to their charitable missions,
often referencing current elected federal officeholders who have
supported or opposed those positions—activities that the
Commission noted in its October 23, 2002, rules on “electioneering
communications” are considered by the public to be “highly desirable
and beneficial.”
Although this advisory opinion is given in response to a request
from a political committee, many of the activities that the opinion
would treat as expenditures under the Act seem strikingly similar to
activities of 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations that had not
been previously treated as expenditures, including activities more
appropriately characterized as lobbying or fundraising or
nonpartisan voter activation. In its attempts to regulate these
activities of political committees, it is critical and essential
that the Commission clarify this will not apply to legitimate,
nonpartisan activities by 501(c) organizations.
Effective advocacy work generally requires references to the elected
officials who have sponsored or led efforts to support or oppose
particular legislation, yet this opinion appears to define any communication that includes criticism or praise of an elected
federal official who is running for re-election as an expenditure
that is subject to FECA rules.
As the Commission recognized in its BCRA rulemaking,
federal tax law requires that 501(c)(3) organizations refrain from
any indication of support or opposition for candidates, and thus any
ruling that legitimate 501(c)(3) activities might also be an
expenditures under the Act would create
enormous complications for charitable organizations seeking to
comply with both tax and election laws.
We share the concerns expressed in comments submitted by a coalition
of nonprofit organizations including the Alliance for Justice,
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, League of Conservation
Voters, NAACP, NARAL Pro-Choice America, People for the American
Way, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and Sierra Club. We
are particularly troubled by the suggested restrictions on voter
registration efforts and fundraising communications, and the implied
prohibition on contributions by foreign nationals to any nonprofit
organizations engaged in voter registration, get-out-the-vote and
other activities in connection with a federal, state, or local
election for public office. These nonpartisan activities are vital
to increasing civic participation by all citizens. Given the
disturbingly low levels of participation by qualified citizens in
the elections, encouraging greater participation is an important
responsibility of our voluntary organizations.
For all of these reasons, we strongly urge the Commission not to
issue the draft opinion in its present form. Please feel free to
contact me or our Vice President for Public Affairs, Patricia Read,
if you have questions or would like further information.
Respectfully submitted,
Diana Aviv
President and CEO
INDEPENDENT SECTOR
cc: Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub
Commissioner Bradley A. Smith
Commissioner David M. Mason
Commissioner Danny L. McDonald
Commissioner Scott E. Thomas
Commissioner Michael E. Toner
|
|